Jakub Paul vs Facundo Diaz Acosta Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 25 Jul at 03:30 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Paul vs F. Diaz Acosta

SUI
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ARG
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Paul 1 - 0 Acosta
They have played 2 sets in total, with Jakub Paul winning 2 and Facundo Diaz Acosta winning 0. The last match between Jakub Paul and Facundo Diaz Acosta was at the Zug Challenger, 25-07-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Jakub Paul getting the victory 6-2 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Paul | 1 |
| Acosta | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) Zug Challenger(07-25-25)
J. Paul vs F. D. Acosta H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $2,285 | Career Prize Money | $611,865 |
| 56.50% (239-184) | Career Total W/L | 59.84% (228-153) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 5 | Titles | 9 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 37.50% (3-5) |
J. Paul vs F. D. Acosta Match Preview:
- Second serve strength shows Acosta outperforming Paul, with 45.35% vs. 42.09% of points won. A significant indicator? Yes, as this closely predicts match outcomes.
- Paul excels in return games, claiming 45.71% of opponents' second serve points, with Acosta at 40.4%. First serve returns also favor Paul at 29.86%, compared to Acosta's 22.54%.
- Under pressure, Acosta leads with a 60.78% breakpoint save rate, over Paul's 55.26%. How critical is this stat? It’s quite beneficial for in-game betting.
- Performance-wise, Paul boasts a 66.67% match win rate in the past year, whereas Acosta has a 37.93% rate. Does this indicate a clear leader? Historically, yes.
- On surfaces, Paul shines on Hard courts with a 65% win rate, while Acosta excels on Clay with 64%. However, both struggle on I.hard surfaces.
- Paul primarily competes at the Challengers/ITF level, winning 66.13% of matches, while Acosta plays on the Main tour, securing 25%. How does event level affect predictions? It situates Paul as more successful on his typical circuit.
- Facing higher ranked opponents, Acosta's average was 148.07, while Paul faced 348.93. Does opponent quality influence performance? Typically, yes.
- In deciding sets, Paul has a significant edge, winning 60% compared to Acosta’s 14%. Might this indicate resilience? Absolutely.
- Paul slightly edges Acosta in breakpoint conversion, at 29.79% against 28.21%, offering a slight advantage in critical spots.
Editorial Prediction (July 25, 2025, UTC):
The comparison between Paul and Acosta reveals distinct advantages. Paul's superior performance in return games, coupled with a higher match win rate over the last year, indicates a competitive edge.
Acosta shows strength on the second serve and saves breakpoints more efficiently, presenting a challenge to Paul. However, Paul's record in crucial deciding sets heavily favors him, suggesting a consistent ability to close matches under pressure.
In terms of surface comfort, Paul's proficiency on Hard courts could be influential if the match occurs on similar surfaces, further tipping the scales in his favor.
Given these factors, the likelihood of Paul securing a victory in their upcoming encounter is notably higher.
Jakub Paul vs Facundo Diaz Acosta Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Paul vs F. D. Acosta H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 7 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:50:29 | Average Match Time | 1:50:29 |
| 67% (60/90) | 1st Serve % | 59% (41/69) |
| 58% (35/60) | 1st Serve Win % | 51% (21/41) |
| 43% (13/30) | 2nd Serve Win % | 32% (9/28) |
| 44% (7/16) | Break Pts Won % | 31% (4/13) |
| 57% (39/69) | Return Points Win % | 47% (42/90) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Paul Recent Matches Played
F. D. Acosta Recent Matches Played

J. Paul vs F. D. Acosta Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.50% (239/184) | YTD Win/Loss | 59.84% (228/153) |
| 55.87% (533/421) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.58% (519/367) |
| 51.99% (4655/4298) | Games Win/Loss | 53.55% (4507/3910) |
| 65.12% (84/45) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.00% (28/28) |
| 55.37% (98/79) | Clay Win/Loss | 62.89% (200/118) |
| 48.72% (57/60) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/4) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
| 678 | Aces Total | 1009 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
| 921 | Total Double Faults | 1243 |
| 1:30:57 | Average Match Time | 1:48:38 |
| 469.86 | Average Opponent Rank | 348.21 |
| 62% (17009/27428) | 1st Serve % | 58% (15159/25929) |
| 65% (11005/17009) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (10403/15159) |
| 49% (5158/10429) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (5475/10770) |
| 45% (1363/3032) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1245/2869) |
| 42% (11477/27142) | Return Points Win % | 42% (10963/26181) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 29.41% (5/12) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 12.50% (1/7) |
| 14.29% (1/6) | Main Tour W/L | 50.00% (25/25) |
| 56.83% (79/60) | Challenger W/L | 62.09% (113/69) |
| 57.40% (159/118) | Futures W/L | 67.74% (84/40) |
| 56% (233/417) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (224/365) |
| 100% (4/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 29% (2/7) |
| 58% (66/114) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (58/117) |
| 46% (49/106) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (64/124) |
| 85% (241/206) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (238/196) |
| 14% (241/34) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (238/42) |
| 18% (182/32) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (142/33) |